[MLton-commit] r4294
Matthew Fluet
MLton@mlton.org
Fri, 6 Jan 2006 13:06:46 -0800
Moving TODO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A mlton/branches/on-20050822-x86_64-branch/runtime/TODO
D mlton/branches/on-20050822-x86_64-branch/runtime/gc/TODO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copied: mlton/branches/on-20050822-x86_64-branch/runtime/TODO (from rev 4292, mlton/branches/on-20050822-x86_64-branch/runtime/gc/TODO)
===================================================================
--- mlton/branches/on-20050822-x86_64-branch/runtime/gc/TODO 2005-12-21 02:03:30 UTC (rev 4292)
+++ mlton/branches/on-20050822-x86_64-branch/runtime/TODO 2006-01-06 21:06:44 UTC (rev 4294)
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+* what type should be used for the size field in GC_heap? I'm using
+ size_t currently, since that is the type needed by malloc.
+* Why does hash-table use malloc/free while generational maps use mmap/munmap?
+
+* Use C99 <assert.h> instead of util/assert.{c,h}
Deleted: mlton/branches/on-20050822-x86_64-branch/runtime/gc/TODO
===================================================================
--- mlton/branches/on-20050822-x86_64-branch/runtime/gc/TODO 2006-01-06 21:06:26 UTC (rev 4293)
+++ mlton/branches/on-20050822-x86_64-branch/runtime/gc/TODO 2006-01-06 21:06:44 UTC (rev 4294)
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-* what type should be used for the size field in GC_heap? I'm using
- size_t currently, since that is the type needed by malloc.
-* Why does hash-table use malloc/free while generational maps use mmap/munmap?