Team PLClub ICFP entry -- comparing the performance of OCAML and SML
Stephen Weeks
MLton@sourcelight.com
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 13:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
At the request of several SML/NJ developers, I reran the benchmarks with some
newer versions of SML/NJ: 110.25 and 110.29. Here are the results.
110.9.1 110.25 110.29
OCAML MLton SML/NJ SML/NJ SML/NJ
holes 1.8 3.5 6.4 4.7 5.0
fov 1.5 2.1 6.1 4.8 4.4
intercyl 1.6 2.4 8.9 6.5 6.0
snowgoon 2.9 4.0 13.2 8.6 8.4
dice 3.9 5.7 15.5 11.3 10.8
golf 1.5 2.5 5.8 4.3 4.2
cone-fractal 3.7 4.9 13.0 9.0 8.4
large 4.3 3.1 3.9 3.9 7.6
pipe 5.4 5.3 17.9 13.2 11.3
chess 16.0 17.8 60.4 40.4 38.6
fractal 12.2 8.7 40.6 26.9 41.1
geom-mean 3.6 4.4 12.2 9.0 9.5