Team PLClub ICFP entry -- comparing the performance of OCAML and SML
Henry Cejtin
henry@sourcelight.com
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 04:04:40 -0500
I'm surprised that it actually made much of a difference since I wouldn't
have thought that much time was spent in the library routines. Of course it
is a big win if you do many calls because they don't even involve a call.
I.e., sqrt(), for instance, is inlined directly into the `caller'.
I wonder what in gods name is going on with SML/NJ paying such a huge price
for array subscript checking. This is REALLY horrible since it encourages
people to use unsafe subscripts.