no new version yet
Henry Cejtin
henry@sourcelight.com
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 00:29:38 -0500
The stuff you sent me had a bunch of problems, so it is not up yet.
One problem is that the string `VERSION' appears in a bunch of html files.
It was clearly supposed to get replaced by 20010803, but it wasn't. (There
also are some uses where it seems it was supposed to be replaced by some
version of SML/NJ, and that wasn't done either.)
The naming convention for the Red Hat 6.x files is very inconsistent. Here
are what they look like:
mlton-VERSION-1.i386.rpm
mlton-VERSION-1.i386.tgz
mlton-VERSION-1.rhat6x.i386.rpm
mlton-VERSION-1.rhat6x.i386.tgz
mlton-VERSION-1.src.rhat6x.rpm
mlton-VERSION-1.src.rpm
mlton-VERSION.src.tgz
Note that the rhat6x part is usually just after the full version, but for the
src rpm it is just before rpm. I'm assuming that this is a typo, and that
mlton-VERSION-1.src.rhat6x.rpm
should be changed to
mlton-VERSION-1.rhat6x.src.rpm
Also, all the files except for the source tar use the trailing -1 as part of
the version. For consistency, this file should do the same. I.e., change
mlton-VERSION.src.tgz
to
mlton-VERSION-1.src.tgz
Any way, I await the next attempt.