new codegen

[Jagannathan, Suresh]

Ignore my previous message; like Henry, I was confused by the column
headings.

-- Suresh

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Weeks [mailto:sweeks@intertrust.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 6:43 PM
To: MLton@sourcelight.com
Subject: Re: new codegen



> Any idea of what is going on with tailfib (20% slower) or tensor (30%
slower).
> I assume that vector-concat (60% slower) is due to the unfold thing in the
> basis library.  Sad.

I think you are misreading the (confusing) column headers.  The new mlton is
in
the first column, and is faster on the three benchmarks you mention.

benchmark         MLton stable-MLton old-MLton