MLton (fwd)
Matthew Fluet
fluet@CS.Cornell.EDU
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 13:55:53 -0500 (EST)
> > There seems to be a minor increase in code size, but I'm not
> > precisely sure why.
>
> Could it be due to the fact that you used notInLoop instead of inLoop
> when deciding what to carry in registers?
Could be, although pseudo-regs shouldn't be live around loops, so I'm
surprised that anything changed with -native-live-false.
> I think it wouldn't be too
> bad to change your code to do a tree fold to get inLoop.
No, it wouldn't be. I'll see what that does.