new SML/NJ
Henry Cejtin
henry@sourcelight.com
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:20:44 -0600
Well damn. I knew that performance would suck. It was just the overloading
I wanted. While I'm developing a program it is nice to use SML/NJ for its
type checking, and with the bogus overloading that doesn't work. I have gotten
around this so far by just using
structure IntInf = Int
at the start, but have sometimes found that that works but the program is
still wrong because some where I called some function explicitly from Int.
Oh well.
Did you do any timing test on the new SML/NJ? Did ML-RISC speed the Intel
code up much?