not THAT bad
Henry Cejtin
henry@sourcelight.com
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:10:22 -0500
In the CHANGES file, for 2000-5-30, the bug that caused polymorphic equality
to return true when it shouldn't have, you should explicitly say that it only
did this if the constructor was unused or something. (I know that isn't
quite right.) As is, it really looks like a much worse bug than it was (I
think).
In 2000-2-12, the match compiler problem, it isn't clear from the description
if this is talking about a compile time speed-up or a run time speed-up.
This should be made clear.
In 2000-11-8, algebraic laws to the CPS shrinker, change
specifically target to IntInf primitives
to
specifically targeted to IntInf primitives
IntInf