limit check bug

Stephen Weeks MLton@sourcelight.com
Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:40:27 -0800


> Ok,  I  thought  that  we  wanted  at  least  LIMIT_SLOP  available after the
> allocation.  Hm, perhaps that is true any way because of  limit  being  moved
> back.

Exactly.

> Any  comments  on  if  the  limits  (like ram size) are unsigned, or could be
> unsigned?

They should be unsigned.  If you find some that aren't, please fix
them.