[MLton-devel] pinned large arrays
Andrew Wright
akwright@acm.org
Wed, 22 May 2002 19:09:12 -0400
Henry Cejtin writes:
> I don't deny that manually listing the tests out of loops is inelegant.
> You are thinking of the file itself as consisting of data structures, which I
> tend not to since you lose portability (byte order, word size, etc.). In my
In this case I think speed is going to rule the day. I want to
*completely* avoid any marshalling/unmarshalling and even copying
between user and kernel space at all.
> The problems of pinning objects with fragmenting the virtual address space
> are really quite serious. A friend of mine is pimped by this (in C) all the
> time. Once 64-bit machines are here (perhaps in under a year of AMD does ok
> with Sledge-hammer) then that problem will go away, but for now it is going
> to make any solution rather tenuous.
It is quite possible that serious uses of the applications I have in
mind would only be run on seriously big 64 bit machines.
Andrew
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
MLton-devel mailing list
MLton-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlton-devel