[MLton-devel] Blocking bug under Cygwin

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:36:59 +0100

--------------060206080301020904010202
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable

Stephen Weeks a =E9crit:

>>In the meantime, I will look at changes since 20020714 to see what
>>segfaults have been fixed.=20
>>   =20
>>
>
>There was a bug fixed on 2002/07/20 that could cause seg faults in
>programs using threads/signals.  That's the only obvious possibility I
>could find.
>
>In general, I'd feel much more comfortable if you used 20020923
>instead of 20020714+mods, because 20020923 has seen much wider use by
>others.  IIRC, your mods for 20020714 were to add {pack,unpack} and
>some gc constant tweaks.  Certainly {pack,unpack} are in 20020923, and
>there have been some changes to them since 20020714.  And the gc
>tweaks should be easy enough to make.  If you are uncomfortable with
>the generational gc in 20020923, it is easy enough to turn off, and
>suffer no performance penalty, by compiling your application
>-mark-cards false.  Is there anything else that prevents you from
>upgrading?
> =20
>
I have completed installing and recompiling with 20020923 and it works=20
fine, even in self-check mode.

Thanks a lot !

--------------060206080301020904010202
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body>
Stephen Weeks a &eacute;crit:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
 cite="mid15928.11563.550437.550293@gargle.gargle.HOWL">
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">In the meantime, I will look at changes since 20020714 to see what
segfaults have been fixed. 
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
There was a bug fixed on 2002/07/20 that could cause seg faults in
programs using threads/signals.  That's the only obvious possibility I
could find.

In general, I'd feel much more comfortable if you used 20020923
instead of 20020714+mods, because 20020923 has seen much wider use by
others.  IIRC, your mods for 20020714 were to add {pack,unpack} and
some gc constant tweaks.  Certainly {pack,unpack} are in 20020923, and
there have been some changes to them since 20020714.  And the gc
tweaks should be easy enough to make.  If you are uncomfortable with
the generational gc in 20020923, it is easy enough to turn off, and
suffer no performance penalty, by compiling your application
-mark-cards false.  Is there anything else that prevents you from
upgrading?
  </pre>
</blockquote>
I have completed installing and recompiling with 20020923 and it works fine,
even in self-check mode.<br>
<br>
Thanks a lot !<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------060206080301020904010202--

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
MLton-devel mailing list
MLton-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlton-devel