[MLton-devel] FSF and our GPL license question

Matthew Fluet fluet@cs.cornell.edu
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:24:43 -0400 (EDT)


> I heard from the FSF and they confirmed our analysis that MLton being
> licensed under the GPL requires executables generated by MLton to also
> be licensed under the GPL.

That's too bad.  But, since the SML/NJ License is considered an
open-source/free-software license, the proposed changes we suggested
should probably satisfy both sides.