[MLton-devel] monomorphisation and the opus

[Stephen Weeks]

> Any way, Matthew is right that MLton doesn't do polymorphic recursion,  which
> is  absolutely  fine with me, but there is a real argument to talk about this
> in the opus I think.  One is that it shows the Haskell people that  they  are
> not  at  all unreachable. 

This point makes sense to me.  One point of the opus should be to
convince people to try whole program compilation in other situations
besides SML, either by modifying MLton's front end, or by applying
some of the ideas from MLton in a new compiler.


-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com

_______________________________________________
MLton-devel mailing list
MLton-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlton-devel