[MLton] survey

[Suresh Jagannathan]

It looks good.  A couple of suggestions:

1. A box for respondents to indicate the kinds of applications they've
developed with MLton (or would like to develop) might be interesting.

2. Instead of a simple checkbox for improvements, how about
a numerical ranking scheme (1 = most important, 5 = least important)?

3. I think the items listed in the improvements section should be
aggregated based on:
       --- interfaces
       --- libraries and FFI
       --- debugging/testing/profiling
       --- documentation and licensing
Currently, these different topics are interleaved in no apparent order.


On Jan 5, 2005, at 2:46 PM, Stephen Weeks wrote:

>
> I put up a first cut of this year's survey at
>
> 	http://mlton.org/Survey
>
> Please have a look and make any suggestions for improvements,
> questions you'd like to see asked, questions you'd like to answer :-),
> etc.  I plan to finalize and announce the survey this weekend or next
> week.  The submit button is currently not enabled, so people don't get
> confused and think we are ready for submissions.
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLton mailing list
> MLton@mlton.org
> http://mlton.org/mailman/listinfo/mlton
>