[MLton] IntInf implementation questions

Stephen Weeks MLton@mlton.org
Sat, 4 Feb 2006 17:20:41 -0800


> I think this is an artefact of the long-gone days before MLton
> supported overflow.  It seems fine to replace as you suggest.

In fact, since the IntInf implementation has not been substantially
revised since those days, it probably has a number of similar
artefacts that would benefit from rewriting to take advantage of
overflow.