[MLton] Re: [MLton-commit] r4672
Stephen Weeks
sweeks@sweeks.com
Tue, 4 Jul 2006 16:59:54 -0700
> [BTW, what we really need are bitwise coercions between Real64.real and
> Word64.word and Real32.real and Word32.word.
...
> So, implementing nextAfter{Down,Up} wouldn't need to bounce through
> PackReal/PackWord ops:
...
> I think that will be just as good as the C-function (and better, since
> it'll be inlined).
I agree. I had forgotten about the not-yet-existent primitives. I
eagerly await their existence :-).