[MLton] approaches to parallelism in ML
Stephen Weeks
sweeks at sweeks.com
Tue Oct 10 16:35:18 PDT 2006
> >> LLVM appears to be the most actively developed of the three. Is this
> >> correct? Would porting to one of these be the same amount of work as
> >> to a specific architecture?
> >
> > As a rough guess, yes. Although my above point about instability does
> > apply. LLVM is a less stable target than SPARC assembly.
>
> I would say that porting to one of these projects is actually
> significantly easier than a native codegen.
I agree. I'm not sure what I was thinking when I said otherwise.
More information about the MLton
mailing list