[MLton] Re: [MLton-commit] r5662
Henry Cejtin
henry.cejtin at sbcglobal.net
Thu Jun 21 12:13:52 PDT 2007
I agree that the notion of bitwise-equality of reals is useful, just that it
should not be Real.==. On the other hand, if there were a cheap conversion
to Word? (and Word?'s that were large enough) then that would be good enough
I think.
Speaking of reals, it would be nice if there were a Real type for the full
80-bit reals. Gcc gives you this with `long double'.
More information about the MLton
mailing list