[MLton-user] language extensions

[Alexandre]

Stephen,

I just think about such a thing as good editor and documentation.
As for editor - I see, there is no clear solution (except for (X)Emacs, 
which is not for everyone), but as for documentation, I just think 
about make a-la PHP documentation - it will be useful for me, while 
studying language and useful for community to have good references for 
all standart + libs + user comments. I can not promise I will do it, 
but I think I will try. The only one (small) problem is that I don't 
really think, that wiki good for that...


Regards,
/Alexandre.

On Dec 29, 2004, at 23:47, Stephen Weeks wrote:

>
>> Stephen, does I understand you right: you would like to make MLTon SML
>> compliant. That's enough. All other features will be good, but it's
>> enough.
>
> Yes, and to clarify, MLton is already as SML compliant as any other
> SML compiler, and typically much more so.  We are very pedantic about
> following the Definition of SML, and about fixing bugs.  Our list of
> bugs
>
> 	http://mlton.org/UnresolvedBugs
>
> includes three bugs, two of which indicate problems with the
> Definition and one of which is a parser issue.  And that list is
> complete, to the best of our knowledge.  Compare, for example, to the
> list of deviations from the Definition that we have compiled for
> SML/NJ
>
> 	http://mlton.org/DeviationsOfSMLNJ
>
> And that list is surely incomplete.
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLton-user mailing list
> MLton-user@mlton.org
> http://mlton.org/mailman/listinfo/mlton-user
>