[MLton-user] MLRISC in MLton
Nikolaos Kavvadias
nkavv@physics.auth.gr
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:15:20 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> A couple of years ago, I did most of the work to 'port' the MLRISC
> sources to MLton; essentially, eliminating the SML/NJ extensions.
> I reported a little on the experience at:
> http://mlton.org/pipermail/mlton/2004-February/025040.html
>
> MLRISC has been mostly stable in the meantime, so it wouldn't be
> difficult to update them and make them available. I started
> porting MLRISC with the vague notion of attempting to use it for
> MLton's backend, but I found that the documentation on MLRISC
> leaves much to be desired in terms of actually using it. There is
> also some complication using MLRISC with SML/NJ's compilation
> manager (CM), which was never entirely clear how to resolve.
>
> So, while I could point you to some Standard ML sanitized code for
> MLRISC, I'm afraid that I can't offer any advice on MLRISC itself.
>
Thanks Matthew for your answer. It would be nice if you pointed me to
an SML environment which was stable at a time (even some time in the
past, e.g. when you were working on the MLRISC porting) regarding
MLRISC support. I have a done a few builds with latest cvs, 110.57,
110.0.7 on RH 7.3, 9.0 and cygwin and all these run on problems (the
basic environment is set, sml -H reports mlrisc modules), but when
compiling "make.sml" from the MLRISC source tree it eventually
breaks). A stable even a little old MLRISC port, would allow me to
work on using MLRISC as a retargetable backend for cross-compiling
(SML or C via ckit).
thanks in advance
Nikolaos Kavvadias
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEAyWXMPiy0tCWlz4RAgMhAJ0edzCQSU/diXH/LBZmxIlVsdjWHwCgshuw
GlKiElzs191FiVb8XdAbA/0=
=NC9q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----