forwarded message from Henry Cejtin

[Stephen Weeks]

Received: from maguro.epr.com ([198.3.162.27]) by wasabi.epr.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
	id MMYHVH5S; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 14:11:22 -0700
Received: from magrathea.epr.com (firewall-user@magrathea.epr.com [198.3.160.1])
	by maguro.epr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16298
	for <sweeks@intertrust.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magrathea.epr.com (8.8.4/8.7.3) id OAA15484 for <sweeks@intertrust.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pc245.edi.nunet.net(199.249.165.245) by magrathea.epr.com via smap (3.2)
	id xma015323; Tue, 6 Jun 00 14:11:50 -0700
Received: (from henry@localhost)
	by syzygy.clairv.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA22943
	for sweeks@intertrust.com; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 16:11:33 -0500
Message-Id: <200006062111.QAA22943@syzygy.clairv.com>
From: Henry Cejtin <henry@clairv.com>
To: sweeks@intertrust.com
Subject: Re: C FFI
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 16:11:33 -0500

The big thing will be that some one will have to do the constant folding
that currently is done by the C compiler.  Other than that it doesn't seem
too bad.