[MLton-devel] SmallEiffel mark-sweep GC
Henry Cejtin
henry@sourcelight.com
Thu, 2 May 2002 16:59:29 -0500
Yes, that was the paper. After reading most of it over I agree that it isn't
quite what we would want. Their use of small blocks of memory all with one
type means allocation is considerably more expensive. As you say, it would
be a gain for small objects in the non-nursery generations.
Is the reversal method really good cache-wise? I guess you don't have a lot
of choice since any thing else can use unbounded amounts of memory, but with
it you are doing a lot of writes.
_______________________________________________________________
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: bandwidth@sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
MLton-devel mailing list
MLton-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlton-devel