[MLton-devel] Fwd: C back end for MLton

[Stephen Weeks]

> Here's what I got back from the gcc mail list:
...
> I forgot to mention:  The use of asm is nonsensical here anyway.  A simple
>   int Int_quot (int n, int d) { return n / d; }
> produces exactly the same code.

I've checked the code in to our CVS to eliminate the __asm__ in
Int_quot and Int_rem.  Maybe you can try recompiling the runtime to
see if it works for you now?


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm 
Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
_______________________________________________
MLton-devel mailing list
MLton-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlton-devel