[MLton-devel] IntInf primops

Stephen Weeks MLton@mlton.org
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:38:38 -0800

> > Anyways, I guess we could be really safe by disabling IntInf.<< and
> > IntInf.*.  Anyone have any opinions?
> That is fine by me. 

OK.  I'll do it after I package the experimental release.

> (I assume that you consider IntInf.+ safe because it can only grow
> linearly.)


> You are right that constant folding on IntInf's aren't as good as
> they could be.  I can only see it working on "small" IntInf values.

It's on the todo.

This SF.NET email is sponsored by: A Thawte Code Signing Certificate 
is essential in establishing user confidence by providing assurance of 
authenticity and code integrity. Download our Free Code Signing guide:
MLton-devel mailing list