[MLton-devel] IntInf primops

[Stephen Weeks]

> > Anyways, I guess we could be really safe by disabling IntInf.<< and
> > IntInf.*.  Anyone have any opinions?
> 
> That is fine by me. 

OK.  I'll do it after I package the experimental release.

> (I assume that you consider IntInf.+ safe because it can only grow
> linearly.)

Right.

> You are right that constant folding on IntInf's aren't as good as
> they could be.  I can only see it working on "small" IntInf values.

It's on the todo.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: A Thawte Code Signing Certificate 
is essential in establishing user confidence by providing assurance of 
authenticity and code integrity. Download our Free Code Signing guide:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0028en
_______________________________________________
MLton-devel mailing list
MLton-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlton-devel