[MLton-devel] FSF and our GPL license question

[Matthew Fluet]

> I heard from the FSF and they confirmed our analysis that MLton being
> licensed under the GPL requires executables generated by MLton to also
> be licensed under the GPL.

That's too bad.  But, since the SML/NJ License is considered an
open-source/free-software license, the proposed changes we suggested
should probably satisfy both sides.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
MLton-devel mailing list
MLton-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlton-devel