[MLton-devel] Re: finalization in MLton

[Matthew Fluet]

> > > OK, I think that's a good compromise, to add new' (or whatever is a
> > > better name -- suggestions appreciated).
> >
> > "init"?  (Or is it oxymoronic to initalize a value with a finalizer?)
> >
> > Or "finalize"?
>
> Of those I prefer "finalize", but that still reads to me like the
> finalizer is being run now.  The best I could come up with is
> "newAdd".  Maybe it should be left out after all ...  I think I'll
> wait for more of a push to put it in.

I thought of  "finalizeWith"  while walking home.  Or, maybe
"withFinalizer" sits better with "addFinalizer".




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
MLton-devel mailing list
MLton-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlton-devel