[MLton] the next public release

Stephen Weeks MLton@mlton.org
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:07:50 -0700

> Would it be consistent with the MLton philosophy to have a flag that
> allowed MLton to accept SML/NJ and other language extensions for
> compatibility purposes? The flag could have three values "warn",
> "pure", and "quiet".

Based on the email I just sent, I'd have to say yes it is consistent,
as long as the default value is pure.