[MLton] Re: testing MLton's new front end
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:31:02 -0600
It is very very counter-intuitive to me that the error in redundant.sml is
reported on line 16 (instead of 19). Your example of a function being
applied multiple times with the redundancy only being for some applications
certainly seems to argue for this case. Of course if the functor is large,
then the only information you get is that the functor could be redundant and
that this application was, but no indication of where in the body it is.