[MLton] ffi improvements
Stephen Weeks
MLton@mlton.org
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:56:38 -0700
> Oh, BTW is there any reason not to adopt the convention of putting all
> unsafe interfaces into an Unsafe structure. i.e.
>
> MLton.Unsafe.Pointer rather than just MLton.Pointer
>
> Just to make sure the user knows what to expect. :)
Good point. I don't think there are any other unsafe modules in the
MLton structure -- does anyone else see any? Given this, I wonder
whether it is worth doing the move now, or waiting until after the
release at which point this stuff will probably move to a library.