[MLton] filedes = int (was: Stack size?)
Mon, 11 Jul 2005 19:08:19 -0700
> I certainly agree that we don't want to duplicate the code in the
> libc section of sleep. I just don't think that there is a good
> reason to pitch the fractional-second part of the sleep so-called
> system call. nanosleep is also in Posix. I couldn't see what
> section, but that was enough to tell me that it would be ok to just
> call nanosleep() (no other computation, just converting the
> Time.time arg to the struct timespec).
This makes sense, and weakens my feeling, but I still lean toward
calling sleep. I'm interested to hear other opinions.