[MLton] Callback to function pointer?

Stephen Weeks MLton@mlton.org
Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:32:08 -0700

> "&" would probably be better, but I chose "#" because it was already known 
> by the lexer.  Since "&" is a valid SML identifier (and "#" is not), it 
> complicates the lexer/parser (admittedly, not by that much).
> Another alternative is a different keyword:
>   _address "name": MLton.Pointer.t;

How about this, and dropping the ": MLton.Pointer.t;", since that's
the only reasonable type for an address?

   _address "name"