[MLton] Re: Ray tracer update
Stephen J. Bevan
Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:54:30 -0700
Matthew Fluet <email@example.com> writes:
>> For me, SML would need to have the following:
>> 1. Friendlier error messages from the compiler.
> Again, eagerly awaiting specific examples of this criticism.
The MLton error format doesn't appear to be friendly to Emacs
next-error parser i.e. I can't step through the errors using C-x `.
The default mode for GNU Ada has the same incompatibility but the
compiler has a --emacs option get it to generate Emacs friendly error
messages. Is there something equivalent for MLton or some other way
of allowing Emacs to step through the errors?