[MLton] Re: Hurd on l4 / ConcurrentML

[Stephen Weeks]

> For now, if anyone wants to do some low-level manipulation of
> programs built with MLton, they can just drop llvm-gcc in place of
> gcc and they will be left with LLVM IR on their disk.
...
> For now, I can do all the LLVM-related work I want to do anyway

The obvious question being: did you get any better MLton code out of
the llvm-gcc codegen than the gcc codegen?