[MLton] approaches to parallelism in ML

[skaller]

On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 15:17 -0700, Kip Macy wrote:

> >From a *very* cursory examination of the web pages and posts I've
> read in the past, LLVM appears to be the most actively developed of the
> three. Is this correct? Would porting to one of these be the same amount
> of work as to a specific architecture?

LLVM doesn't run AMD64 yet. Well, it does, but its closed source.
I believe it is about to be opened (maybe has been since I last
looked).

-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net