[MLton] Hmmm.... ML
Daniel C. Wang
danwang at CS.Princeton.EDU
Sat Oct 21 08:41:51 PDT 2006
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1784
I wonder how fast a MLton compiled version of the spec would be..
Specifying ECMAScript via ML
Brendan Eich has just mentioned
<https://mail.mozilla.org/private/es4-discuss/2006-October/000151.html>
on the es4-discuss mailing list
<https://mail.mozilla.org/private/es4-discuss> that we will be using ML
as the definition language for the semantics of ECMAScript Edition 4
<http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1543>. One of the immediate
benefits of this approach will be that our definition will also serve as
a reference implementation. LtUers will of course recognize this as the
approach of "definitional interpreters" (discussed on LtU here
<http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/classic/message8879.html> and countless
other times
<http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Alambda-the-ultimate.org+definitional+interpreters>).
More information about the MLton
mailing list