[MLton] Replacing Subversion with a DVCS
Ville Laurikari
ville at laurikari.net
Tue Apr 14 09:51:08 PDT 2009
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 05:23:09PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Ville Laurikari <ville at laurikari.net> wrote:
> > It seems to me that the MLton project would benefit from a distributed
> > version control system.
>
> I don't think it's so important. MLton development is pretty slow at
> the moment and at least I've had no problems with using subversion.
I wouldn't have asked if I didn't have any problems with using
Subversion. Accessing mlton.org from some machines at work is quite
cumbersome. Either I had to spend time setting up ssh tunnels to
access mlton.org or work without version control.
Luckily, I've recently discovered git-svn which solves this problem
for me.
> Don't fix it if it ain't broke?
Depends on what constitutes "broken" and how much an improvement
costs :)
Subversion is bad enough that I would argue that switching to
something better might make sense even for a one-foot-in-the-grave
project such as MLton.
Anyway, this was just a probe to see if there's any interest in this
sort of thing. There appears to be none, so never mind...
--
http://laurikari.net/ville/
More information about the MLton
mailing list