[MLton] survey
Stephen Weeks
MLton@mlton.org
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:25:38 -0800
> Despite the fact that question 5 says that left means more beneficial, I would
> put this on top of the radio buttons. I.e., something like
>
> more less
> important important
> x x x x x ports to new platforms
> x x x x x read-eval-print loop
> x x x x x separate compilation
Good idea. Have a look now.
> With regard to the `improved documentation', I wonder if it is worth
> separating out the different types of documentation: MLton libraries to write
> other programs vs. MLton internals to hack the compiler (vs. MLton internals
> to add some more FFI).
This is much like the other ones we could split out to ask for
specific instances: platforms, libraries, optimizations. So, I think
it's best left to the open-ended textarea below.