Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:15:42 -0500
It looks good. A couple of suggestions:
1. A box for respondents to indicate the kinds of applications they've
developed with MLton (or would like to develop) might be interesting.
2. Instead of a simple checkbox for improvements, how about
a numerical ranking scheme (1 = most important, 5 = least important)?
3. I think the items listed in the improvements section should be
aggregated based on:
--- libraries and FFI
--- documentation and licensing
Currently, these different topics are interleaved in no apparent order.
On Jan 5, 2005, at 2:46 PM, Stephen Weeks wrote:
> I put up a first cut of this year's survey at
> Please have a look and make any suggestions for improvements,
> questions you'd like to see asked, questions you'd like to answer :-),
> etc. I plan to finalize and announce the survey this weekend or next
> week. The submit button is currently not enabled, so people don't get
> confused and think we are ready for submissions.
> MLton mailing list