[MLton] survey

[Stephen Weeks]

> 1. A box for respondents to indicate the kinds of applications they've
> developed with MLton (or would like to develop) might be interesting.

Are you saying something that's not covered by questions 6 and 7?

> 2. Instead of a simple checkbox for improvements, how about
> a numerical ranking scheme (1 = most important, 5 = least important)?

OK.  I went for 4 radio buttons.  I think that's enough to express
different priorities and am tempted to only use 3.

> 3. I think the items listed in the improvements section should be
> aggregated based on:
>        --- interfaces
>        --- libraries and FFI
>        --- debugging/testing/profiling
>        --- documentation and licensing
> Currently, these different topics are interleaved in no apparent order.

OK.  I grouped them.