Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:36:09 -0800
> 1. A box for respondents to indicate the kinds of applications they've
> developed with MLton (or would like to develop) might be interesting.
Are you saying something that's not covered by questions 6 and 7?
> 2. Instead of a simple checkbox for improvements, how about
> a numerical ranking scheme (1 = most important, 5 = least important)?
OK. I went for 4 radio buttons. I think that's enough to express
different priorities and am tempted to only use 3.
> 3. I think the items listed in the improvements section should be
> aggregated based on:
> --- interfaces
> --- libraries and FFI
> --- debugging/testing/profiling
> --- documentation and licensing
> Currently, these different topics are interleaved in no apparent order.
OK. I grouped them.